Greater Huntington Park & Recreatuib Dustruct Agenda, March 27, 2013

The meeting was ran by President, Bill Kelley. The meeting opened with an invocation, pledge of allegiance and was called to order by Kelley. The minutes were approved from the Feb. 27, 2013 meeting.

New Business was discussed and four motions were passed. THe first motion was an approval of the Community Participation Grant Program Contract to preserve and repair the historic train station building in the amount of $1,000.

The second motin was the approval of a resolution of a second gran program to repair the St. Cloud softball field in the amount of $3,500. The third was the approval of a change of scope for trash resepticles for $500. And the last was a discussion and approval of 2013-2014 Fiscal Year Budgets.

The meeting ended with an announcement of the next board meeting on April 24, 2013 and adjournment by Kelley.

Second Faculty Senate Meeting - March 14

The main topic of discussion during the March 25th Faculty Senate meeting was a report on budget and staff given by university president Kopp.

The presentation included information about possible upcoming budget cuts, possible solutions to these budget cuts and the current staffing budget allotment.

Marshall could be facing an overall $6.5 milltion dollar budget cut in the upcoming years, $1.2 million coming directly from the medical school.

A possibel solution presented by Kopp was the possibility of an increase in the state "pop tax." This is a tax on all cans of soda sold within the state. This tax goes to West Virginia University's medical since 1958.

Just a couple cent increase on this tax could not only cover the money going to WVU but also distribute it to other state universities including Marshall.

Without a solution, Kopp said that the university could be facing around a $730 intuition increase.

In the staff budget report the president pointed out that 46 percent of Marshall's faculty were full professors, a stastic much higher than the state or national average.

According to Kopp, to get on par with state average, Marshall would have to slow the advancment of faculty from instructor to professor.

Faculty Senate Votes In Favor of Tocacco-Free Policy

Marshall University's Faculty Senate  backed the proposed tobacco-ban .

The policy is  the result of a survey conducted at the university's assessment day last year, in which 71 percent of students and 74 percent of faculty voiced support of a tobacco-free policy on campus. The proposed policy  was originally drafted by Marshall University's Student Government Association last semester and works to eliminate the use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products  from campus.

After being passed by the Student Government Association, the policy moved to the floor of the Faculty Senate and passed in an overwhelmingly positive voice vote at its monthly meeting on Thursday. However, the policy did not go uncontested.

"It's about personal freedom," Jamil Chaudri, professor in the College of Information Technology and Engineering, said. "What right do we have to prevail upon others to give up a habit?"

Chaudri, a past smoker but kicked the habit over thirty years ago, voiced that he feared this policy was simply the objection of an action by a majority working to squash the actions of a minority.

There were also those who spoke in favor of the policy before the vote. "Their personal freedom ends at my nose," said psychology professor, Pamela Mulder.

Mulder voiced her support for the bill based on health issues, speaking about the dangers and concerns of second hand smoke on non-tobacco users.

The policy will now go before the Marshall University Board of Governors later this semester for a final vote.

West Virginia University passed a similar policy in Morgantown that will go into effect later this year.

State of the Union Predictions

 Later this month, President Barack Obama will present America with his first State of the Union address since his second term re-election last year. But before the president can take the podium it is important to consider topics that will likely appear in the address this year.

The president certainly has a set of recurring themes in his addresses, including his forthcoming policy updates on immigration. Immigration policy has been an issue Obama has worked closely with since his election in 2009, referring to it in his 2010 State of the Union address as a “broken system.” But even with more recent issues pulling on the president’s mind, like his new movement in stricter gun control laws following several tragic mass shootings in 2012, immigration will no doubt make up at least a small mention in the 2013 address.

The gun control debate that has congress locked in battle has become championed by Vice President Joe Biden and openly supported by Obama. Obama gun control policies center on semi-automatic weapon private-ownership and have met great resistance from his conservative counterparts.

Another issue likely to be addressed in Obama’s speech is his upcoming clash with Republican Congress members over taxes and the ever-looming “fiscal cliff” America experienced earlier this month. The president will likely remain silent on the Bush Tax cut expiration, but will address the outcomes of those expirations and, at the very least, assure citizens of the attention he intends to pay toward America economic problems.

On the economic decline front, Obama will likely also address America’s unemployment rate. America unemployment went through a sharp downward spike earlier in the Obama presidency but, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, has been holding steady since mid-2012. However, the topic was of heated debate during the 2012 election and will likely still be in the forefront of the American mind.

Gay rights is another issue the president is likely to tackle in 2013. The president has become more vocal on the issue since his election in 2009 when he ended Clinton’s conservative “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy which made it difficult for openly homosexual men to enlist in the military. Obama has worked to move gay rights to the forefront of political issues since then, applying more liberal laws on the Federal level.

In a speech given in Las Angeles during his campaign trail in 2012, Obama vowed to block any attempts made by conservative Congress members to roll back headway made in the Gay Rights movement, vowing to continue his work for equality.

Obama will also bring the success and operation of his health care reform plan to light, which has been another recurring topic for the president in his past State of the Union addresses. Health care reform was one of Obama’s main focuses in his 2012 State of the Union, when explained the lack of order in the country’s current system and explained congresses need to accept his administration’s reforms.

"There's a reason why many doctors, nurses, and health care experts who know our system best consider this approach a vast improvement over the status quo." Obama said.

Speculation on Obama’s State of the Union Address could be endless. The president is in his last term, a cherry position for a president. He will have less concern about pleasing Congress and will have the ability to more brazenly present his plans, be they popular or not. He will recognize the conflicts that will likely erupt between congressional parties but he will have the voice of the people who elected him for a second time into office beside him as the nation pushes forward. Either way, America will know soon enough.

The Paved Path

President Obama made his pledge to "preserve, protect and defend the constitution of the United States" for a second time before a vast crowd with his hand resting earnestly on two bibles. Monday was President Obama's second time taking the helm of the White House after being elected to office originally in 2009. President Obama became the first Afro-American to ever serve as President of the United States. And President Obama would once again make history after securing reelection last year against opponent Mitt Romney. It was a scene that would have been unimagined in the days of Civil Rights Era activist Martin Luther King, Jr.

 “We affirm the promise of our democracy.” Said Obama in his inaugural address, “We recall that what binds this nation together is not the colors of our skin or the tenets of our faith or the origins of our names.”

As fate would have it President Obama’s second inauguration ceremony fell on the day America has set aside to honor Martin Luther King, Jr., another historic and praiseworthy American. Martin Luther King, Jr., who spent his life fighting for civil rights, is the only African American to have a federal holiday in his honor. And while the inaguration was meant to honor President Obama and his future in America, it is important to look to the man that in many ways paved the path for President Obama to take Presidential office. 

King is often hailed as the most influential leader in the Civil Rights Era, organizing peaceful protests, petitions and activities in the name of equality throughout the fifties and sixties.

It was King’s bible that Obama’s hand was resting on as he took office Monday. In a time of “separate but equal” King called the world’s attention to a problem boiling at the heart of American equality. Before King, African-Americans and whites attended separate schools, lived in separate neighborhoods, served separately in the military and weren’t even allowed to drink from the same water-fountains. It was a time of racism and inequality in American history, strengthened by radical groups such as the Ku Klux Klan and white supremacists.

According to his biography presented by the Nobel Peace Prize organization, before his assassination in 1968, he had been arrested over 20 times, had his home bombed and been violently assaulted at least five times. However, to King these were not the numbers that mattered. King had received five honorary degrees, in 1963 became Time magazine “Man of the Year” and, most importantly to King, in August of 1963 over 250,000 people came to hear him give his famous “I have a Dream” speech. At only thirty-five King became the youngest man ever to be awarded the Nobel Peace, deciding immediately to give his prize money (over $54,000) to the further assist the civil rights movement.

As King pressed on, he pushed America to better itself, to be what America should have been all along. As King explained in his famous speech, “I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal."

Because of King’s efforts, the “separate but equal” mentality and laws in America began to disappear and America slowly took its first steps toward true racial equality.

And now it is 2013, and Barak Obama repeats his oath to uphold his duty as President of the United States of America. According to District of Columbia officials, nearly 2 million people came in 2009 to see President Obama sworn into office, and on reelection around 800,000 people attended the ceremony.

Obama has aged since he spoke in front of those 1.8 million people in 2009, his eyes are heavier and his hair more grayed. In a report released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, America’s unemployment rate has risen to around 7.8% in recent years and the war in the Middle East still rages on. According to CNN, President Obama became the seventeenth man in American history to give a second inaugural address.

“For we remember the lessons of our past, “Obama said in his second inaugural address, “when twilight years were spent in poverty and parents of a child with a disability had nowhere to turn. We do not believe that in this country freedom is reserved for the lucky or happiness for the few. We recognize that no matter how responsibly we live our lives, any one of us at any time may face a job loss or a sudden illness or a home swept away in a terrible storm.”

President Obama is a testament, a nod to King and his dream. King’s work paved the way to equality, his life and efforts ever spent towards justice and fairness in a time when those things were in short supply. And as Obama walks that path that King fearlessly laid, America can take a breath and keep moving to the future because equality, as King knew, was a constant struggle strengthened by those who spoke out.

Proposal for King/Inaguration Column

Subject:  The inauguration of President Obama, America’s first African American president, into his second term on Martin Luther King Jr. day.

Scope: I will research both the background of Martin Luther King Jr. and his valiant efforts towards civil rights and then move into the election of President Obama in 2009 and his road to reelection in 2012.

Need: Rather readers support the democratic party or not, it will be a notable moment that President Obama will be inaugurated into office on a day honored for a man who dedicated his life to civil rights.  Even more, the inauguration marks Obama’s second term as presidency and his inauguration is a nod to the future of America while remembering King in the past.

Methods: This story will be recorded by including quotes and moments from President Obama’s inauguration. I will also include facts and statistics about the ceremony.  But I will also give a brief history about King and his involvement in the Civil Right’s Movement.

Sources: I will use the inauguration ceremony itself as one of the primary sources in this piece, including everything from the turnout and the cost, to the President’s speech. I will include Internet research on King and past articles about President Obama from credible newspapers including The Washington Post.

Presentation: This is a single article that would make a timely addition to the Editorial page. It could be comfortable fit with either an image of President Obama or Martin Luther King Jr. or even both men.

Follow-Up: I do not at this time intend to write a follow-up to this piece.

New York Times Op Ed Coloumnists Gail Collins and Bill Keller

Bill Keller - South Africa Since Mandela
Bill Keller has written a couple pieces about his knowledge and experience in South Africa, however, this one is unique in its discussion of the struggles facing South Africa's development since Nelsen Mandela. Keller's tone is one of quiet woe as he explains the great hope and trust the people of Africa had put in Mandela, and while he did so much for the country, they are still in the days of early liberation. Keller's lead shows this, giving the example of Mandela having to explain to local reporters that he was not the "Messiah." However, Keller's piece (and his stated opinion in other pieces) is not critical of Mandela but overall shows admiration. However, given this, the body explains that Mandela did not truly accomplish his dream of true government in South Africa.

"For what he left in his wake was not really a government yet," Keller writes, "or even a genuine political party, but a liberation movement, with the mentality, customs and culture of constant struggle."

 Keller has been to South Africa multiple times to observe and research its culture and politics and gives intensive background information not just on Mandela but also on the evolution of South African politics.

Keller's final words are those of concern for South Africa. He ends the piece, perhaps hopefully, questioning South Africa's future.

"The urgent question now," Keller asks, "is whether the movement that is Mandela’s bequest to his country can mature into a more credible government before the public runs out of its famous patience and starts looking for a new messiah."

*~~~~~~~~~~~~~*

 Gail Collins - The Woes of Roe

Gail Collins' piece, The Woes of Roe, gives a great look at the problems facing the pro-choice movement in a decades old debate - abortion. She talks with annoyance the yo-yo effect that comes with liberal and conservative fluctuations in the government concerning the issue. Facilities are forced to adapt to changing conservative and liberal laws with each new election, sometimes losing experienced staff, funds or even facilities only to be expected to reopen when a liberal front washes through.

She leads very factually by observing the forty year anniversary of the governing precedent on the issue, the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade. She then discusses the shift of support in recent years to a more pro-life classification in young people and in the second paragraph questions this poll resule stating that "if you ask Americans whether they agree with the Roe decision, nearly two-thirds say yes."

Collins presents a fair amount of research in the column, giving a brief history of political fluctuation concerning the issue and some statistical data about opinion polls and perhaps flawed outcomes.  

Her final statements best explain her frustrated tone but also conclude her prediction for the future of the issue.

 "Every time the anti-abortion movement pushes too far," Collins concludes, "it reminds people that its cause, no matter how filled with moral fervor, is basically about imposing one particular theology on the rest of the country. Over the long run, the nervous, ambivalent, uncomfortable public won’t let that happen"